[내신대비] 2026년 대비 EBS 수능특강 영어 워크북(5강 All)

 

[내신대비] 2026년 대비 EBS 수능특강 영어 워크북(5강 All)

 

2026년 대비 EBS 수능특강 영어 학습을 위한 워크북입니다. 이 포스팅은 EBS 수능특강 영어를 공부하고 있는 학생이나 강의하는 선생님들에게 유익한 자료가 될 것이라고 생각합니다.

 

이번 포스팅은 5강 1번~4번 문제에 대한 워크북 자료입니다. EBS 교재 원문은 5강은 “함축적 의미 파악” 문제로 출제되었습니다. 변형되어 출제되는 내신대비를 위하여 이 워크북이 도움이 될 것이라 확신합니다. 이 자료를 공부하기 이전에 EBS 수능특강에 나온 문제를 모두 풀어보신 이후에 이용하시길 바랍니다.

 

 

[1] 지문 분석

주제: 과학적 진리와 그 중요성 or 과학적 진리의 객관성과 사회적 담론의 차이

 

요지: 과학적 질문은 명확하고 검증 가능한 답을 가지며, 사회나 정치 담론에서도 이러한 과학적 사고가 필요하다.

 

내용 정리:

• "고도 3만 피트에는 문화 상대주의자가 없다"는 말로 시작, 과학의 보편성과 절대성을 강조.
• 공기역학 법칙은 정치적, 사회적 편견과 무관하게 진리로 통용됨.
• 과학적 사고는 실험과 관찰을 통해 답을 찾고, 삶을 향상시키며 기술 발전에 기여함.
• 낙하산의 효능은 여론조사로 알 수 있는 게 아니라 과학적 사실에 기반해야 함.

어조 및 성격: 논리적, 단호한 어조, 비판적, 설명적, 주장적, 과학의 중요성을 강하게 주장하는 분석적이고 비판적인 글

 

기타 특징:

반어적 표현 사용(예: 문화 상대주의 언급)

과학과 사회의 대조를 통해 핵심 주제 강조

구체적인 예시(항공 역학)를 통해 추상적인 개념을 설명.

과학적 방법론의 중요성을 강조하며 사회적 담론의 문제점을 비판.

'3만 피트에는 문화적 상대주의자는 없다'라는 흥미로운 비유로 글을 시작한다.

 

예상 문제 유형: 주제 찾기, 내용 일치/불일치, 어휘 선택, 글의 요지 파악

 

 

2026대비 EBS 수능특강 영어 5강 “함축적 의미 파악”

 

1. There's a saying that there are no cultural relativists at thirty thousand feet. The laws of aerodynamics work regardless of political or social prejudices, and they are indisputably true. Yes, you can discuss to what extent they are an approximation, what are their limits of validity, do they take into account such details as quantum entanglement or unified field theory (of course they don't). But the most basic scientific concept that is clearly and disturbingly missing from today's social and political discourse is the concept that some questions have correct and clear answers. Such questions can be called "scientific" and their answers represent truth. Scientific questions are not easy to ask. Their answers can be validated by experiment or observation, and they can be used to improve your life, create jobs and technologies, save the planet. You don't need pollsters or randomized trials to determine if a parachute works. You need an understanding of the facts of aerodynamics and the methodology to do experiments.

 

 

2. When a community stopped hunting female wild cattle, those herds would, over time, tolerate the closer presence of humans. By watching the wild cattle, as our deep ancestors watched predators and learned about their lives, these more recent ancestors could have begun to understand the life cycle of the wild cattle and made a few risky, but creative, ventures. They started bringing a few, as youngsters, into the villages, building pens and trying to keep them alive, and they succeeded. They'd been watching the cattle across generations ― they knew about their life cycles, shared that information with one another, and collaboratively came up with ideas about raising their own cattle ― and thus prey domestication was born. Once cattle, sheep, pigs, llamas, and goats were living with humans, it was a simple task to do, like with dogs, a bit of behavioral and morphological shaping via direct manipulation (for wool, milk production, or rapid growth for meat). The selection of specific individuals to breed was an initial step toward modern domestic animals. And hamburgers.

 

 

3. The primary impetus of scientific and technical innovation has been our increased ability to reach out and exchange ideas with others, as well as to borrow other people's ideas, and blend them with our own to create something new. Combinatorial creativity is the acknowledgment that nothing is genuinely unique, at least not in the sense of being constructed entirely from scratch. That notion is met with considerable resistance in creative spaces. To create is to start with a blank canvas. However, much data exists to support this ecosystem of influences and inspirations. Nina Paley, an artist, shot and animated ancient relics from the Metropolitan Museum of Art to illustrate her point that all creation is derivative. Every work of art is a derivative work. In animation, Oliver Laric examines the reappropriation of images in his video essay "Versions" by looking at how Disney recycles animation. Creativity is the original open-source code.

 

 

4. Freud long ago distinguished between the conscious and the unconscious minds. But today's understanding of the unconscious mind is not Freud's seething unconsciousness, with its repressed impulses and instincts. It's a cooler and bigger information processing system. Our memory, thinking, language, attitudes, and perceptions all operate on these two tracks ― a conscious, deliberate "high road" and an unconscious, automatic "low road." Our high-road mind is reflective; our low-road mind is intuitive. Consider driving: Your brain and hands know how to move into the right lane. But if you are like most drivers, you can't consciously explain how you do it. Most drivers say they would turn right, then straighten out. But that would steer them off the road. Actually, after moving right, you reverse the steering wheel equally to the left of center, and only then return to the center position. But no worries, your low-road-guided hands know how to do it.

 

 

5강 전체 워크북은 첨부된 파일을 이용하세요.

 

2026 EBS 수능특강 영어(5강) Workbook.pdf

0.72MB