[내신대비] 2026년 대비 EBS 수능특강 영어 워크북(7강 All)

 

2026년 대비 EBS 수능특강 영어 학습을 위한 워크북입니다. 이 포스팅은 EBS 수능특강 영어를 공부하고 있는 학생이나 강의하는 선생님들에게 유익한 자료가 될 것이라고 생각합니다.

 

이번 포스팅은 7강 1번~4번 문제에 대한 워크북 자료입니다. EBS 교재 원문은 7강은 “제목 파악” 문제로 출제되었습니다. 변형되어 출제되는 내신대비를 위하여 이 워크북이 도움이 될 것이라 확신합니다. 이 자료를 공부하기 이전에 EBS 수능특강에 나온 문제를 모두 풀어보신 이후에 이용하시길 바랍니다.

 

[1]  지문 분석

주제: 익숙한 소비 습관을 점검하고, 더 경제적인 선택을 하라는 제안

 

내용 정리

• 도입부“사과 한 알의 미덕”을 언급하며 시작하지만, 더 나은 대안(예: 바나나)이 있을 수 있음을 제시.
• 비용 비교사과는 계절에 따라 $1까지도 할 수 있지만, 오렌지는 절반, 바나나는 1/4 가격에 살 수 있음.동일한 슈퍼마켓에서도 이 정도의 차이가 존재.
• 가정 적용 예시
• 네 가족이 사과 대신 바나나를 선택한다면 1년에 $1,100을 절약할 수 있음.
• 별다른 쇼핑 전략 없이도 가능하다는 점을 강조.

핵심 메시지

• 단순한 습관이나 선호가 아니라 비용 대비 가치를 고려한 소비 습관이 필요함.
• 슈퍼마켓 하나만 잘 활용해도 충분히 절약 가능.

 

필자의 의도

익숙한 소비 습관을 돌아보게 하고, 작지만 실질적인 소비 전략을 제시함으로써 독자들에게 경제적 사고와 실천을 촉구하려는 목적이 있음.

 

어조 및 문체

• 어조: 대화체적, 설득적, 실용적
• 문체: 설명적이면서도 독자의 실천을 유도하는 친근한 어투 사용
• 독자 대상: 일반 소비자, 가족 단위의 독자

 

서술 방식

• 질문으로 시작하여 독자의 생각을 유도
• 비교(가격), 구체적 예시(네 가족), 결론(절약 가능성) 구조
• 추상적 개념 없이 구체적인 수치와 사례를 중심으로 설명

 

핵심 어휘 정리

• trap: 함정
• substitution: 대체
• budget: 예산
• habit: 습관
• worth: 가치가 있는

 

2026대비 EBS 수능특강 영어 7강   “제목 파악”  본문

 

1. Is there any more virtuous practice than eating an apple a day? Maybe not ― unless it's eating a banana instead. Don't fall into the trap of buying the same fruits week after week just because you're in the habit of always packing an apple for lunch, for example. A large Red Delicious might cost as much as $1, depending on the season, when an orange might cost half as much and a banana only a fourth. If that's the case, take a minute to ask yourself: Is having an apple really worth four times as much as having a banana instead? Put another way, if your family of four substituted a less expensive banana for apples, you'd save $1,100 in a year without making any other changes to your budget and without shopping around. It's important to note that the prices in this example are from the same supermarket. Shopping at numerous stores isn't necessary when you know what the costs of simple substitutions are in terms of variety and size.

 

 

2. Punishment can be imposed by the person or group against whom the transgressor transgressed, or by a third party, or by oneself (guilt acts as a form of self-punishment). Generally, punishment carries a cost to the punisher, like the energy needed to perform the punishment, as well as some risk of revenge. Punishments that are extra dangerous or risky are considered costlier. Sometime in our distant past, we realized that mere exposure to public humiliation could be used where physical, often violent elimination from the group had previously been required. The emergence of shaming as a social option would have reduced the cost of punishment, because mere exposure that served to damage an individual's reputation in front of the group could have negative consequences ― for instance, members of the group might choose not to cooperate with the shamed individual in the future. Shaming and social exclusion are closely linked, but shaming is less costly. And unlike transparency, which exposes everyone, shaming exposes only a section of the population.

 

 

3. One of the greatest barriers to human understanding and communication is that we cannot see inside another person's mind. This limitation gives rise to unintended misunderstandings and allows people to employ all sorts of deceptive strategies, both consciously and unconsciously. Some of the ways digital technology is helping us overcome this barrier include various means of truth (or lie) detection, multimodal communications, and digital readouts of our own and others' brain waves. Already, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), using digital computer analyses of brain patterns captured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans, are able to tell what a person is thinking about. It is likely, according to these researchers, that our children will, in their lifetimes, be able to read people's thoughts and even have access to direct brain-to-brain communication. While these developments will clearly raise ethical issues and privacy questions that will have to be addressed, there can be little doubt that as people gain access to and learn to take into account others' unspoken motives, thoughts, needs, and judgments in their own thinking, their wisdom will increase.

 

 

4. In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle used the example of a builder and a shoemaker to demonstrate an important point. If the builder constructs a house for the shoemaker, then the shoemaker must pay for the work in shoes. "But to determine how many shoes will be paid to the builder, a proportional equality must be established between the goods, and then reciprocity effected. Only then will the fair exchange be realized. But if there is no proportionality, the exchange is not equal and fair and will not hold together." The builder would not have need of as many pairs of shoes necessary to compensate him. This is where money enters. It serves as a proportional medium of exchange. The proper proportion of shoes to the house in money terms makes the deal just. It is not simply a pricing mechanism but must be capable of producing well-being as well. "Thus, money acts like a measure: it makes goods commensurable and equalizes them. For just as there is no community without exchange, there is no exchange without equality and no equality without commensurability."

 

 

7강 전체 워크북은 첨부된 파일을 이용하세요.

 

2026 EBS 수능특강 영어(7강) Workbook.pdf

0.87MB